Journal Home
Search for

Volume 46, Issue 4, Pages 345-348 (December 2009)


View previous. 11 of 25 View next.

Management of varicella contacts in pregnancy: VZIG or vaccination?

Judith A. TroughtonaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Grainne Crealeyb, Vivienne Crawfordc, Peter V. Coylea

Received 10 August 2009; received in revised form 24 August 2009; accepted 10 September 2009. published online 15 October 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Varicella infection during pregnancy poses a serious risk for both foetus and mother. It has been suggested that it would be more cost-effective to screen antenatally with post-partum vaccination, which occurs in the US, than the current policy of checking immune status post varicella exposure, with VZIG administration where necessary. Additionally, it is doubtful whether the current policy provides best patient care, when a vaccine is available.

Objectives

The study aims to retrospectively compare the cost of the current policy with a cost estimate for antenatal screening with post-partum vaccination in NI.

Study design

A cost estimate of antenatal screening of primigravidas, with post-partum vaccination, was calculated for two models: (1) verbal screening, with serological testing of those with no history of varicella infection and (2) serological screening of all primigravidas.

Results

The cost of VZIG issued to pregnant women in 2006 was £100,800; 43% of births were to primigravidas therefore the estimated cost of VZIG issued to multigravidas was £58,100. The cost of verbal screening with post-partum vaccination is estimated at £23,750 p.a., saving £34,350 over current policy.

The estimated cost of screening all primigravidas with post-partum vaccination is £43,000, saving £15,100.

Conclusions

This retrospective study suggests that in NI either of the proposed antenatal screening strategies would be less costly than current practice. This finding supports the suggestion that varicella immunity testing should be included in the Antenatal Infectious Diseases Screening Programme, either as part of the universal vaccination programme or solely as an antenatal programme.

a Regional Virus Laboratory, Royal Group Hospitals Trust, Belfast BT12 6BN, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

b Clinical Research Support Centre, Royal Group Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

c School of Medicine & Dentistry, Whitla Medical Building, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7BL, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 2890 634117; fax: +44 2890 311416.

PII: S1386-6532(09)00430-2

doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2009.09.014


View previous. 11 of 25 View next.