Journal of Clinical Virology
Volume 53, Issue 4 , Pages 332-337, April 2012

Awareness of cytomegalovirus infection among pregnant women in France

  • A.G. Cordier

      Affiliations

    • AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92140, Université Paris-Sud, France
  • ,
  • S. Guitton

      Affiliations

    • Maternité Hôpital Foch, 40 rue Worth, 92 Suresnes, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • C. Vauloup-Fellous

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U764, Université Paris-Sud, Clamart F-92140, France
    • AP-HP, Service de Microbiologie-Immunologie Biologique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92140, France
  • ,
  • L. Grangeot-Keros

      Affiliations

    • INSERM, U764, Université Paris-Sud, Clamart F-92140, France
    • AP-HP, Service de Microbiologie-Immunologie Biologique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92140, France
  • ,
  • J.M. Ayoubi

      Affiliations

    • Maternité Hôpital Foch, 40 rue Worth, 92 Suresnes, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
  • ,
  • A. Benachi

      Affiliations

    • AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92140, Université Paris-Sud, France
  • ,
  • O. Picone

      Affiliations

    • AP-HP, Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart F-92140, Université Paris-Sud, France
    • Maternité Hôpital Foch, 40 rue Worth, 92 Suresnes, Université Versailles Saint Quentin en Yvelines, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: Service Gynécologie Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère 157, Rue de la porte de Trivaux, Clamart F-92141, France. Tel.: +33 1 45 37 47 70; fax: +33 1 45 37 43 66.

Received 14 November 2011; received in revised form 29 December 2011; accepted 29 December 2011. published online 24 January 2012.

Abstract 

Background

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most frequent cause of congenital virus infection. Approximately 1% of newborns are infected by CMV at birth with severe consequences among 10% of them. Efficacy of hygienic counselling is nowadays established and should be spread.

Objective

To evaluate pregnant women's awareness of cytomegalovirus infection in France.

Study design

Pregnant women receiving prenatal care, at any moment of their pregnancy, in two different obstetrics clinics with different information policies, were asked to complete a written questionnaire about CMV infection.

Results

More than half (217/362, 60%) of the pregnant women had heard of congenital CMV infection, and most of them (72%) knew the hygiene measures to use to prevent infection. Nevertheless, most could not correctly identify the symptoms associated with congenital CMV disease. Awareness was associated with hospital's policy concerning CMV infection information, the mother's educational level, parity, and employment in health care. Indeed, when information is supposed to be given (hospital A), 74% (vs 34%) know congenital CMV infection and among them the knowledge is more precise.

Conclusions

This study tends to confirm that there is a large gap between knowledge of CMV and the burden of this disease. To bridge this gap, women should receive education about congenital CMV. Hospital-based prenatal education increases awareness and knowledge about CMV and CMV prevention.

Keywords: Cytomegalovirus, Patient knowledge, Pregnancy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1386-6532(12)00002-9

doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2011.12.031

Journal of Clinical Virology
Volume 53, Issue 4 , Pages 332-337, April 2012